Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has issued a stern warning to Life Time Fitness regarding its policy that permits biological men to use locker rooms designated for women and young girls. This move comes in response to safety concerns raised by gym members and is part of a broader legal and societal debate over gender identity and public safety.

Background of the Issue

Life Time Fitness, a national chain of health clubs, has been under scrutiny for its policy allowing individuals to use locker rooms that align with their gender identity rather than their biological sex. This policy has sparked significant controversy and concern, particularly among members who worry about the safety and privacy of women and young girls using these facilities.

Attorney General’s Letter

In a letter dated August 2, 2024, Attorney General Bailey criticized Life Time Fitness for its handling of member concerns and highlighted the potential legal ramifications of the policy. Bailey noted that Missouri law considers a male’s presence in a female-designated public restroom as criminal trespass, referencing Missouri Revised Statutes and the case of State v. Girardier.

Bailey stated, “Missourians recognize that allowing adult men to openly invade and disrobe in spaces set aside for women and young girls is indefensible and places political correctness above public safety.” He emphasized the importance of adhering to biological distinctions in public facilities to ensure safety and compliance with the law.

Legal Context

Missouri law, as cited by Bailey, indicates that the presence of a male in a female-designated public restroom or locker room can constitute criminal trespass and potentially lead to further criminal liability for sexual offenses. Bailey’s letter underscores that such policies might enable criminal behavior and assures that his office will not tolerate such risks to public safety.

This issue is part of a larger national debate on gender identity, privacy, and safety in public spaces. Proponents of policies like those of Life Time Fitness argue that they support the rights and identities of transgender individuals. Opponents, however, raise concerns about privacy and safety, particularly for vulnerable populations such as women and children.

Life Time Fitness has yet to issue a public response to the letter. The situation remains fluid, and further legal actions or policy adjustments may follow as the company and the Missouri Attorney General’s office continue to address the concerns raised.