The controversial contract approved for Eagle Pass City Manager Homero Balderas is raising serious questions about the level of compensation and the unprecedented job security provisions granted by the City Council.

Voted in favor by Monica Cruz, Mario Garcia and Billy Davis, voted against Rolando Salinas and Elias Diaz.

Balderas, who was appointed without prior experience as a city manager, is now the highest-paid city manager in the city’s history with a base salary of $175,000 per year. His total compensation package also includes a city vehicle, monthly allowances for telecommunications, and other benefits typically reserved for more seasoned public administrators.

What has stirred particular concern is a clause in the contract that allows Balderas, with City Council approval, to step down into a lower position within the city such as assistant city manager or even department director rather than face termination. This type of fallback arrangement has not been seen in any previous city manager contracts in Eagle Pass.

Questions are being asked about why this language was included in the agreement and whether it sets a dangerous precedent. Are other department directors or city employees afforded the same privilege to slide into new roles in the event they are removed or found ineffective? The answer appears to be no.

The contract’s structure raises broader concerns about transparency and fiscal responsibility. As this is taxpayer-funded compensation, the public has a right to know why this particular city manager received terms so favorable terms that could shield him from accountability if he underperforms or fails to meet expectations.

Critics argue that this type of arrangement potentially undermines the very foundation of city management, where leaders are expected to be held accountable for the performance of city departments and delivery of public services. Instead, this contract ensures a safety net for the top administrator that many in the public and private sectors would never be offered.

The City Council has not provided a clear explanation for the inclusion of this unusual clause. The public deserves answers as to whether this decision was made in the best interest of Eagle Pass or for the convenience of a favored administrator.

As discussions over public trust, spending, and performance continue, residents are watching closely. This contract may very well become a flashpoint in future conversations about governance and the priorities of those elected to serve.

READ THE CONTRACT HERE